← All demos
CiteLLM Check · Legal

Contract abstract vs the amendment

An abstract written at signing, checked against the agreement and its later amendment: 16 of 27 terms no longer hold.

What Check caught

Select one to open it in the review.Open full screen

The amendment extended the agreement to March 31, 2004.

About this demo

NEON Systems' 1996 software distribution agreement was rewritten by a 1999 amendment, but its key-terms abstract never was. Check ties each term to the clause that governs it now.

How this demo was made

The Distributor Agreement and its First Amendment are real SEC filings (Exhibit 10.5 to NEON Systems' 1999 Form S-1/A, via the CUAD dataset), unchanged. The abstract is a sample written for this demo from the base agreement alone, as an abstract written at signing would be; nothing else in it is wrong. The assessments are Claude's, made with CiteLLM Check; CiteLLM located every quotation in the two agreements. Each differing term quotes the amendment's clause and the base clause it replaced. The review above is CiteLLM Check's own viewer, as it opens in ChatGPT and Claude.

The documents

  • CheckedContract abstract - NEON-Peregrine distributor agreement.pdfPDFSample written for this demo
  • SourceDistributor Agreement (Jan 1, 1996).pdfPDFOriginal Exhibit 10.5 to NEON's Form S-1/A, 1999 (EDGAR, via CUAD)
  • SourceFirst Amendment (Jan 1, 1999).pdfPDFOriginal Filed with the same exhibit

Run it on your documents.

Check works inside ChatGPT and Claude. Attach your PDFs, ask, and the review opens beside the chat. Draft tie-outs are part of CiteLLM Pro.

Try in ChatGPTTry in Claude or book a demo →
The request

Check this contract abstract against the agreement and its amendments. Where an amendment changed a term, the amendment governs.

Attach the documents above, select CiteLLM, and paste this request. Needs CiteLLM Pro.

More Check demos

Other documents, same check.